一位 36 歲的大學文科教師,出身中醫世家,寫得了程式碼。他決定用未來的十年,把「上工治未病」這五個字,翻譯成一套能在保險行業運行的技術系統。
A 36-year-old humanities lecturer, born into a family of traditional Chinese medicine practitioners, who also writes code. He is spending the next decade turning a 2,000-year-old idea — treat the disease before it appears — into a technical system that insurers can actually use.
「一場病,可以讓一個幾百萬家產的家庭,幾年之內一無所有。而保險,本該擋在這件事的前面。」
那位同學來自一個殷實的家庭,幾百萬家產、體面的生活、一個典型的中國中產樣本。後來,同學的父親生了一場大病。幾年下來,家裡的積蓄、房子、能變賣的東西,一件一件地換成了病歷本上的診療記錄。
同學沒有抱怨過。只是有一次和劳证华喝酒,說了一句:「如果當時那份保險再厚一點,就好了。」
那句話後來被劳证华記了很多年。它不是一個抽象的行業問題,不是「因病返貧率 44%」這種可以寫進 PPT 的數字。它是一個他認識的、有名字有面孔的家庭,在他眼前被一場病拖走的過程。
從外人看,一位大學文科教師,不像會創辦保險 SaaS 的人。但如果拆開來看,劳证华身上有三樣東西,恰好構成了做這件事的三塊拼圖。
第一塊,是他教了十幾年的學生。他站在講台上帶過的,是中國第一代與健康手環、線上體檢、Keep 一起長大的年輕人。他知道這一代人願意為什麼樣的敘事付出行為改變,也知道傳統保險為什麼打不動他們。保險行業最缺的不是精算模型,是懂人的人。
第二塊,是他背後的中醫世家。他從小聽長輩說最多的一句話是:「上工治未病。」真正好的醫者,不是等病來了才動手,是讓病不發生。這句話在中醫傳了兩千年,但從沒被真正翻譯成一個可運行的系統 —— 因為它需要三件過去不存在的東西:連續的健康行為數據、可信的量化模型、能把「未病」變現為激勵的商業機制。今天,這三件事第一次同時具備。
第三塊,是他寫得了程式碼。這聽起來像一個技能備註,但實際上是這個團隊能存在的原因。文科的敘事能力 + 中醫的健康觀 + 工程師的實現力,三樣缺一,VITA 都做不成。缺敘事,做不出讓保險公司和用戶都聽懂的產品;缺健康觀,產品會滑向另一個計步 App;缺工程,永遠只能停在 PPT 上。
如果十年前有人想做這件事,他做不成。當時沒有普及的可穿戴設備,沒有大模型,沒有可用的合規框架 (PIPL 是 2021 年才有的),也沒有保險行業被承保虧損逼到必須重構定價的緊迫感。
但這五年,四件事同時發生了:
—— AI 與大數據的技術基礎成熟到可以在合規前提下處理數億級的連續行為信號;
—— 可穿戴設備的普及率過了臨界點,運動、心率、睡眠這些過去只能自報的數據,現在是被動生成的;
—— 健康險綜合成本率從 92% 漲到 97%,傳統告知式核保撐不下去了;
—— 個人資訊保護法把「用戶授權 + 可撤回」寫成了硬性要求,反而給守規矩的一方讓出了跑道。
這是一個十年才等到一次的視窗。劳证华不想在講台上眼睜睜地錯過它。
VITA 從第一天起就劃了三條紅線,而且不是寫在牆上的口號,是寫進產品程式碼、寫進客戶合同、寫進他自己的個人信念裡的:
一、VP 永遠不與法幣直接兌換。它是健康權益單位,不是虛擬貨幣。這條線一旦破,VITA 就變成另一個東西。
二、不承諾任何金融收益。健康行為是有價值的,但那個價值該以更好的保險、更好的服務、更好的健康本身回到用戶身上,不是以「收益率」的形式回來。
三、不做醫療診斷。健康分只描述行為表現,不改寫為「你有 XX 病」。這一條是對中醫世家的那個「治未病」哲學,真正的尊重 —— 醫療是醫療,量化是量化,兩件事不能混。
「我不是保險行業出身,這也是我的優勢。我不欠這個行業任何既得利益,所以我敢從第一性原理重來一次。」
問他這件事想做多久,他的答案很短:「一輩子。」
他不覺得這是壯語。健康險的數據基礎設施,不是三年能建成的東西,也不是一個 3-5 年退出的機會。它需要一代人的耐心,需要有人願意在紅利爆發之前先熬過很長的合規期、行業教育期、慢積累期。他在大學裡教了十幾年書,習慣了慢事情;中醫世家告訴他,好東西都是慢慢養出來的。
如果 VITA 能在他這一輩子被建成中國健康險行業真正的數據底座,他覺得這比任何一個「成功創業案例」都值。
"One illness can wipe out a family's decades of accumulated wealth in just a few years. Insurance is supposed to stand between them and that outcome — and too often, it doesn't."
A university classmate of Zhenghua's came from a comfortable family — several million yuan in assets, a stable life, a textbook Chinese middle-class household. Then his father fell seriously ill. Over the next few years, the family's savings, their apartment, and everything they could sell were slowly converted into hospital records.
The classmate never complained. Over drinks one night, he simply said: "If that insurance policy had been a little thicker, it would have made all the difference."
That sentence stayed with Zhenghua for years. It wasn't an abstract industry statistic. It was a family he knew, with names and faces, being slowly dragged under by a single illness — in front of him.
From the outside, a humanities lecturer doesn't look like someone who would start an insurance SaaS company. But if you look closer, Zhenghua carries three things that happen to be exactly the pieces this problem needs.
First, his students. The generation he has been teaching for over a decade is the first cohort in China that grew up alongside fitness trackers, online health check-ups, and running apps. He knows what kind of narrative moves them into behavior change — and why traditional insurance doesn't. What this industry lacks isn't more actuarial models. It lacks people who understand people.
Second, his family's medical heritage. Growing up, the sentence he heard most often from his elders was: "The best physician treats the disease before it appears." This idea has lived in Chinese medicine for two thousand years, but it has never been translated into a working system — because that translation requires three things that did not exist until now: continuous health-behavior data, trustworthy quantitative models, and a commercial mechanism that turns "prevention" into real incentive. Today, for the first time, all three exist.
Third, he writes code. This sounds like a footnote, but it is the reason this team can exist. Narrative skill + a health philosophy + engineering ability — missing any one of the three, VITA cannot happen. Without narrative, no insurer or consumer will understand the product. Without a health philosophy, it slides into another step-counting app. Without engineering, it stays as a slide deck.
Ten years ago, this could not have been built. There were no ubiquitous wearables, no large language models, no usable compliance framework (China's PIPL was only enacted in 2021), and no urgency inside insurers to rebuild pricing from the ground up.
But in the last five years, four things happened at once:
— AI and data infrastructure matured to the point where hundreds of millions of continuous behavior signals can be processed under strict compliance.
— Wearable device penetration crossed the tipping point. Movement, heart rate, and sleep — once self-reported — are now passively generated.
— Health insurance combined ratios in China climbed from 92% to 97%. Traditional questionnaire-based underwriting has run out of runway.
— China's Personal Information Protection Law made "user consent + right to withdraw" a hard requirement — which, counterintuitively, clears the track for companies that play by the rules.
This is a window that opens once in a decade. Zhenghua did not want to watch it close from the lectern.
From day one, VITA has drawn three red lines. They aren't slogans on a wall — they are written into the product code, into every customer contract, and into Zhenghua's own personal position:
1. VP will never be exchanged for fiat currency. It is a health-benefit unit, not a virtual currency. The moment that line breaks, VITA becomes something else.
2. No promise of financial returns. Health behaviors have value — but that value should flow back to users as better insurance, better services, and better health itself. Not as "yield."
3. No medical diagnosis. A health score describes behavior; it never rewrites into "you have disease X." This is what genuine respect for the "treat the disease before it appears" philosophy looks like — medicine is medicine, quantification is quantification, and the two must not be confused.
"I did not come from the insurance industry. That is my advantage. I don't owe this industry any incumbency, so I'm free to rebuild it from first principles."
Asked how long he plans to work on this, his answer is short: "For the rest of my life."
He does not mean this as bravado. A data infrastructure for health insurance is not something you build in three years, and it is not a 3-to-5-year exit opportunity. It requires a generation's patience — someone willing to spend the long compliance-building years, the industry-education years, the quiet-accumulation years, before any real payoff appears. He has taught in a university for over a decade. He is used to slow work. His family's TCM background reminded him early on: good things are grown slowly.
If VITA becomes, within his lifetime, the trusted data backbone of China's health insurance industry, he considers that worth more than any "successful exit."
教了十幾年書的人習慣慢。VITA 不做 1 年的風口,做 10 年的基礎設施。
Someone who has taught for over a decade is used to slow work. VITA is not chasing a 1-year fad; it is building 10-year infrastructure.
「上工治未病」是 VITA 產品哲學的源頭。健康是可以被經營的,不是等病來了才動手。
"Treat the disease before it appears" is the source of VITA's product philosophy. Health can be actively cultivated — you do not have to wait for illness.
敘事需要能被寫成程式碼。文科的思想 + 工科的落地,是 VITA 存在的前提。
A narrative has to be translatable into code. Humanities-driven thinking + engineering execution — this is why VITA can exist at all.
保險公司、再保機構、醫療夥伴、投資人、想加入的同路人 —— 都可以直接聯繫我們。
Insurers, reinsurers, healthcare partners, investors, and future teammates — you are all welcome to reach out directly.